| Author | Comment | |
|---|---|---|
| 201. 13 May 2010 11:59 | ||
 |
from Doug: |
|
| 202. 13 May 2010 12:03 | ||
|
|
From Shanley: |
|
| 203. 13 May 2010 12:08 | ||
|
|
From polenta: |
|
| 204. 13 May 2010 12:13 | ||
|
|
This one is from Yarraki, who did it on (his wife) Mum23's page (so maybe that makes it hers by right of eminent domain or something) |
|
| 205. 13 May 2010 12:17 | ||
|
|
puzzler sent this our way, from her archives (hence ineligible): |
|
| 206. 13 May 2010 12:20 | ||
|
|
These were posted by GingerNinja, but I think only the first is from within our time zone (the two others are older) |
|
| 207. 13 May 2010 12:22 | ||
|
|
from Chinky: |
|
| 208. 13 May 2010 12:24 | ||
|
|
Two from mrozowski: |
|
| 209. 13 May 2010 12:28 | ||
|
|
From Dreamy: |
|
| 210. 13 May 2010 12:32 | ||
|
|
Last but not least, Marky: |
|
| 211. 13 May 2010 12:37 | ||
|
|
And that's it, unless something else arrives while I'm pondering all these.... |
|
| 212. 13 May 2010 13:25 | ||
 |
|
|
| 213. 13 May 2010 13:29 | ||
|
|
So I don't lose track of anything, I guess I'll assemble the ones I'm 'shortlisting'... with occasional comments when I feel bad about eliminating someone: |
|
| 214. 13 May 2010 13:46 | ||
|
|
As an aside... I'm tempted to consider these... I expect Featherhawk will be taken aback to discover he's a Mild Cubist. Well, he's a borderline case, anyway... |
|
| 215. 13 May 2010 13:50 | ||
 |
Oh no...my ego gets sometimes uncontrolable for smaller reasons than that. Thank you for the appreciations Chelydra. I terribly regret I hadn't have much time lately, and unfortunately things are getting crowdier with every second in my 'offline' life, to call it this way. I've been trying to sneak in here at least to take a look. Glad I passed the torch to somebody who has heaten up the forum with such a (well...funny thing, but i failt to see the mild side of this...in terms of controlabilty of course |
|
| 216. 13 May 2010 13:51 | ||
|
|
Another aside: |
|
| 217. 13 May 2010 13:56 | ||
|
|
Holy cow! That little stack of indigo's three pieces is stunningly handsome, is it not? If I were judging that trio as a single entry it would blow away all the other entries. Hmmm. |
|
| 218. 13 May 2010 13:58 | ||
|
|
Hi Shanley, I won't reply now because I'm trying to not get any more distracted than I am already, but thanks for being a good sport and saying nice things (as you always do, and worthwhile nice nice things at that) |
|
| 219. 13 May 2010 14:05 | ||
 |
chelydra, while you're pondering.... can I just rule my picture out? |
|
| 220. 13 May 2010 14:06 | ||
|
|
I think I can resolve this by awarding Indigo the Serendipity Prize. I hope this doesn't hurt anyone's feelings, but I think this accidental vertical triptych of Indigo's is just about the most beautiful thing I've seen in all of TD. (True, twas I who assembled the triptych, but I had no idea I was doing it, so the credit is all Indigo's.) |
|
) wild challenge. It helped me a lot to clear up some ideas. Between those intriguing conversations and (here partially, on artist gallery pages too) and trying to understand what Five calls 'process', things got pretty close to a boiling point for my mind. I still have a lot to digg, but this challenge has built some serious 'documentation'. Thank you all for the experience you have shared! It really feels good to get a little more serious about art. Having no background whatsoever in this field( my only advantage is being curious enough to read and contemplate, think and then think some more), I found the examples in this challenge (and also the ones in 'exploring art') as great lessons. 
