Author | Comment | |
---|---|---|
161. 10 May 2010 23:25 | ||
It's the same view point overall. |
||
162. 10 May 2010 23:26 | ||
By the way, can anyone tell me what 'Mugdots' means (if anything)? |
||
163. 10 May 2010 23:27 | ||
She's the TDer who started the first challenge, way way back, so it carries her name. The other regular challenge once had a name, too, Golden Pen, I think, but that fell away. |
||
164. 10 May 2010 23:28 | ||
The high cubist links include some brief tutorials that get into the figure-ground business... |
||
165. 10 May 2010 23:29 | ||
Thanks. One of the mythic Elders. |
||
166. 10 May 2010 23:42 | ||
figure/ground, some basics... |
||
167. 10 May 2010 23:44 | ||
Very interesting about the depth perception stuff, I practice a lot of eye exercises and perception stuff and it is fun to learn more. One interesting one they use to improve perception in basket ball players, is make a small card that fits on the bridge of the nose but allows you to see only out of peripheral vision. It stimulates the part of your eyes that see's movement. I found it broadens ones whole view of the world when the focus isn't in the center like we normally use. |
||
168. 10 May 2010 23:52 | ||
That's cool, Coho. It's a wider depth perception. |
||
169. 10 May 2010 23:53 | ||
I meant peripheral perception -- geez, need to teach my fingers to type the words I am thinking. |
||
170. 11 May 2010 08:05 | ||
I perhaps can be a bit slow, sometimes. Chelydra, are the London links you posted to your work? The drawings are fantastic. |
||
171. 11 May 2010 08:31 | ||
Yup & thanks. |
||
172. 11 May 2010 08:36 | ||
I showed you mine... |
||
173. 11 May 2010 08:42 | ||
Okay, here's a link to a drawing i did (honoring Daniel Burnham's vision) for the City of Chicago's Riverwalk... |
||
174. 11 May 2010 08:47 | ||
and a link to one more, this one in color ... |
||
175. 11 May 2010 09:15 | ||
I'm going to have to meditate on these for a bit. Not what I expected! Need to adjust. |
||
176. 11 May 2010 09:19 | ||
Was just starting a political cartoon (at the risk of upsetting the equilibrium and blessedly apolitical atmosphere here)... will be back when done... There seems to be a lot going on under the surface in the river walk... |
||
177. 11 May 2010 09:49 | ||
|
||
178. 11 May 2010 18:02 | ||
Five, |
||
179. 11 May 2010 18:56 | ||
Hmm, well, er. hmm, Chelydra. Glad you found something you liked . And I appreciate the flattery that came at the end. On the Burnham drawing, I un-rooted root the features. I think that's what you are talking about -- the eyes are unnaturally close together and not sunk into sockets, the nose and mouth is distorted -- they are crammed into two halves of a rectangular plane that was meant to float; I probably should have pushed that rectangle a bit more to the right, with a bit less white space beside it, or better yet, perhaps the opposite, more white space to the right and the features even more squished together so the distortion was more pronounced. Anyhow, I was trying to have the "face" subtly shifting. Whether it works or not is a separate question. It didn't for you. Still, I'll admit, I can always use practice on portraits; off to draw skulls,now. |
||
180. 11 May 2010 18:57 | ||
I should have also said, thank for your thoughts. I appreciate them. |