Author | Comment | |
---|---|---|
1. 19 Feb 2010 13:35 | ||
I have received some comments by people with whom I had spoken about and applauded the website thinkdraw and the art that is produced. But when I explained the medium and how the pictures are produced I found that the work created was not taken seriously, and considered too easy. This annoyed me because I think it is actually much harder to produce something really good on here than by |
||
2. 19 Feb 2010 13:46 | ||
I have had the same responses from people I have shared TD with Steve... |
||
3. 19 Feb 2010 14:00 | ||
It's ART for some TDers who are ARTISTS!!!!!!! |
||
4. 19 Feb 2010 14:16 | ||
There will always be the traditionalists and the purists to contend with, but the use of collage and montage is well known in the modern art world and this is just a variant of that. Matisse used collage and Hockney made some wonderful photo montages. Some of the artists on here exhibit great skill and put long hours into their work - it is definitely ART! |
||
5. 19 Feb 2010 16:37 | ||
Thank you I share your sentiment, collage and indeed montage require considerable planning, I am in the early stages on TD and it is thanks to artists like yourselves, and the techniques you employ that I feel I am developing into a better artist (gradually) and yes my feeling is that this is art and allows many people of different ages and backgrounds to express themselves in pictures, also I find it more relaxing and satisfying than most computer games. |
||
6. 19 Feb 2010 17:22 | ||
I agree with Polenta. I'm an amateur myself, although I'd surely love to develop into something more...either way, nothing about art is ever easy. Things that were considered by some critics 'childish' in the beginings got to be treasured years later. I'd like to challenge those friends to doing better than people we, the TD-ers, consider artists. It really depends how you look at it. For me two things are essential: |
||
7. 19 Feb 2010 19:01 | ||
http://www.thinkdraw.com/picture.php?pictureId=52779 |
||
8. 20 Feb 2010 05:43 | ||
It's worth mentioning that there are at least two strikes against TD creations being accepted as "art" -- the medium (pixels), and the size (tiny). |
||
9. 20 Feb 2010 13:46 | ||
Qsilv, size is not a consideration, remember the wonderful miniaturist paintings throughout history, particularly portraits. |
||
10. 20 Feb 2010 14:29 | ||
Some years ago there was a contest. Each person should do something in paper and walk through a "runway". Most of us used newspapers or toilet paper. We turned some toilet paper around our necks as a scarf or made the normally folded paper cap we all new from our childhood, etc, etc. Most people tried to be funny because after all we were dealing with paper and had neither glue nor scissors etc We hardly had some newspapers and toilet paper. |
||
11. 20 Feb 2010 15:09 | ||
Not only is it ART and often done by true ARTISTS (not quite me), but it is done with an immense handicap by being forced to use the peculiar odds and ends associated with the various themes offered. Like a portrait done with a blindfold on, or a landscape painted in a small closet. Narrow, narrow choices to use, but very broad results due to creative imagination. |
||
12. 20 Feb 2010 16:55 | ||
puzzler, size matters. ;> (Only not AFTER you've already achieved substantial fame.) |
||
13. 20 Feb 2010 17:16 | ||
And I was told that size didn't matter... |
||
14. 21 Feb 2010 01:49 | ||
I agree with (Normal) about the difficulties presented, and it is precisely those handicaps that makes thinkdraw so delightful, everyone has raised some brilliant points and I believe that everyone on here is an artist, there are varying degrees of artist from the doodler to the perfectionist and the professional artists who like to relax or use this site for mapping out ideas (which is in itself high recommendation for TD), but the one thing I have been able to do is learn from all of you, by watching and using playback I have been picking up techniques and using that to gradually improve my imagination and drawing skills. You are all a great group of people, interesting and insightful and a pleasure to talk to and receive feedback from. 21/2/10 (Stephen Martin - Dover) |
||
15. 21 Feb 2010 02:40 | ||
I've given this some thought, and I tend to believe that people might underestimate TD, becuase they get to see the playbacks. It really makes all look so easy, but in real life you're used to confrunt yourself with all the difficulties imposed by the oil, the paper, the canvas and so on. Wouldn't it be more nice, if people who take playbacks for granted, would understand that using these elements is a thing of imagination too? That there was a first time somebody this or that out? You learn a lot, that's sure, but there are many things you discover without even thinking of it! This is why many of the artists that are here from a longer time 'need' a new theme! |
||
16. 21 Feb 2010 03:25 | ||
I need a new theme!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
||
17. 22 Feb 2010 03:44 | ||
But before you find one Polenta I agree with Steve, Shanley etc that TD is a base fo us all however talented or not we may be. I know from my own very short time on here that I have learnt from watching how others have created their works of art and I feel myself very lucky to have stumbled across this site. It is a continuous learning curve and I love it. With thanks to all you great artists on TD. Pam - Kent. |
||
18. 22 Feb 2010 15:53 | ||
Just a question, a lot of the work I have produced on here has been using the old faces theme, but I have noticed that in Top 5 there is no category for faces! So where does that leave me, because I have ambitions to have one of my drawings displayed there. So does that mean I am provisionally disqualified because I use faces? |
||
19. 22 Feb 2010 16:18 | ||
'Faces' has become the unloved stepchild. |
||
20. 22 Feb 2010 16:38 | ||
We have been asking for it's return to the top 5 page... Who knows, if they put it back in this month, you may have 5 in the top 5 ... |