Author | Comment | |
---|---|---|
1. 27 Jan 2009 03:24 | ||
I just looked at our current showcase 'Flags' and quite a few of the really great ones (like Qsilv's 'Jolly Roger') have been relegated to page 3 or 4. |
||
2. 27 Jan 2009 03:56 | ||
Oh the mire of the rating system! I think it might be a good idea to try. Unless every voter is voting on every entry, the number of stars is not as accurate. |
||
3. 27 Jan 2009 09:01 | ||
(smiles) gosh.. thanks, marg |
||
4. 27 Jan 2009 15:38 | ||
I agree with Qsilv, it really would make the most sense for the total to determine the top pictures. Even if it couldn't be done retroactively it would be something good for the future. Good idea! |
||
5. 27 Jan 2009 18:54 | ||
mmm.... real credit goes to marg, who called it "accumulative" back in a "ratings" post on Jan.14th |
||
6. 28 Jan 2009 03:08 | ||
thanks, Qsilv.. |
||
7. 28 Jan 2009 07:54 | ||
Most ratings would work well too, I noticed today when I went to look there are some in the top rows that only have 1 rating, since it's a 5 they're in above alot of works that have 10 or even 15 ratings. Seems funny. |